Creating intelligences over Manhattan

Do you remember what I wrote about 911 in September? Practically my belief. They created 911 in order to let you discover it was a fraud, a bloody fraud. Then to push you to sympahtise with the Islamic world, which would have been so cruelly targeted thanks to that 'false flag' attack.I hope my lines are read by Muslims. Because they have been fooled twice. So the best thing Vatican can do is not simply to push you to hate America cause its false flag attack, but to close yourself in the narcisism of a self-perceived false intelligence. Narcisism is a jail where to enclose people.I was running along the U.M. Forum in the "terrorist" section and found an interesting video about the 911 hoax. It is evident from that video that 911 has been engineered in order "to discover the fraud". Don't think these are details. These details represent the true war.There's a particular I observed of that video: the anxiety with which they try to explain the 'errors' - errors which then permitted to establish with a scientifical precision the nature of the hoax. There's a sort of ideology, maybe unaware, no, with the most of probability just unaware and automatic, which prevent the truthseeker to embrace the hypotesis that the spectacle has been created to instigate in him that narcisism of which I spoke above.....But the world turns and doesn't wait us. It would be interesting to see if there would have been other means or strategies able to avoid such terrible errors, which could destroy a so (apparently) perfect conspiracy. But when the same truthseekers are destinated to be (mostly) unaware part of the plane....Well, what interest me is just the first part of the video, the part related to the nose. You can immagine that the people the most interested in the 911 conspiracy are part of that fauna which often is interested by exotic arguments, like HAAARP or .....UFO.The first part of the video was too much recalling to me an old video involving UFO and WTC. The video was really prophetic. It was an allusive video and contained in an artistic-conceptual way the essential elements not simply of 911 bloody hoax, but especially of its 'intelligent' analysis of the first video. It contained the nose.... of an UFO.So what I wrote previously agrees with this new evidence. I said that the previous 1993 attack to the Twin Towers was necessary because a possible second attempt would have been not repeated at the first floor. An alibi for a sucessive aerial attack. The aerial attack was necessary because the smoke of a bomb at ground level would have hidden the lateral explosions and no one would have putted them in the camera. They said that the smoke of 1993 attack raised to the 93rd floor. And the flight 11th crushed between 93rd and 101st floor. A symbolic message.Well, I remember how they destroyed that video of the UFO flying near WTC. They broadcasted the revelation in a program of the Italian television. They analyzed the frames like did in the video about the 911 hoax. They demonstrated that the image of the UFO was a fake because it was not perfectly joined with the profile of the skyscraper......Unwilling profecy? Or a planned psychological spin, to prepare in an unaware way the minds to feel themselves "....sooo intelligent" for the next hour "X"? In fact ten years after those minds would 'discover' the same phenomena, but not related to an UFO, at the opposite, related to their country and government....Thanks to the UFO, the civil war destroying America can explode. A war between 'intelligents', of course.

"....September Clues59:56 - 2 anni faWhat was the role of the mainstream media on 9/11?....."

"...UFO at the WTC..."

http://www.rense.com/general41/scihoax.htm

Rense.com

---

WTC Sci-Fi Channel UFO Is CGI...Not UFO9-9-3Update9-24-03

When this article first ran, we received dozens of emails and found quite a lot of commotion about it elsewhere on the net. Many people are convinced the footage is the real deal. In an attempt to clarify even further, I wrote the actress in question, Barbara Sicuranza, and reiterated my query regarding the sci-fi channel "ufo" footage. Again, she confirmed that it was indeed a computer generated hoax (CGI), created as a promo for sci-fi channel. She is a hired actress and this work is listed on her resumé

My Second Email to Barbara...

Hi Barbara

I wrote to your previously regarding the sci-fi channel's video clip, which you listed on your resumé as "blimp." You replied that

----------

yes its a commercial, I'm an actor...all the interest is fascinating,

B

---------

Can you clarify just a little more for me. Many, many people in the ufological community believe the footage is real. that you were in a helicopter with some friends and really saw this object and it was videotaped, as we see it in the clip, moving from behind the WTC building, darting in front of the copter and then whizzing past it at close range and shooting off above it leaving a vapor trail. Can you clarify for me specifically...

1. were you hired as a professional actress to produce this for sci-fi channel as a promotional tool?

2. are you aware that it is not real, but something 'created' as a promotional ad for sci-fi?

3. was it scripted out, and the "blimp" or "ufo" added in later, perhaps digitally?

Any information would be greatly appreciated so as to put the 'authenticity' issue to rest. thank you for your time!

-- James Neff

Webmaster - Rense.com

Barbara's reply...

Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:03:43 -0400

From: Barbara Sicuranza

Subject: Re: hi - help needed again!

To: James Neff

Status:

its cgi not ufo

Further Update MaterialBarbara's husband, founder of the band BLONDIE, notes in weblog...

"... what else have i got... ok, rather than going away my wife Barbara's ufo tv spot that was done for SCI-FI TV here is still pulling in comment and e-mails... the main reason being that the thing was shot using the world trade center in new york as a location... now we've gotten to a place in the culture wherein my denial of the 'reality' of the thing will undoubtedly convince various people of its viability but even though i personally wish that indeed it had been evil aliens who destroyed the trade center, the blame is unfortunately a lot closer to home and the now famous tv spot is just that: a tv spot with a fake photoshop (or whatever) ufo etc etc etc so once again the sci-fi tv spot with the ufo at the world trade center is not a 'real' film of a 'real' ufo, barbara is the person in the helicopter but she was just pointing at empty sky and the ufo images were put in later, neither she nor i have had any alien encounters, been abducted by space. or other aliens, and we are currently not hanging out with any space aliens and to the best of my knowledge have nevr met any creatures from outer space, have never been on a flying saucer etc etc etc"

http://www.blondie.net/chris_stein_20030930.shtml

-------

Original Email

From:webmaster@rense.com

To: barbara@

Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:16 PM

Subject: EMAIL FROM James Neff/ webmaster

Message: Could you verify/clarify something for us please?

In your Resume, \"SCI-FI Promo (The Blimp)\" is listed. Is this the same as the footage many believe is a real UFO near the World Trade Center which shows a woman in a helicopter seeing a UFO which appears to fly at the copter and then take off in the other direction? We want to be certain if this is the same as what you list as \'the blimp\" (?)

the footage is here:

http://www.scifi.com/happens/happens_1_big.mov

any info would be greatly appreciated!

thank you!

James Neff

Webmaster

www.rense.com

Reply

Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 09:46:16 -0400

From: Barbara Sicuranza barbara@

Subject: Re: EMAIL FROM James Neff/ webmaster!

To: webmaster@rense.com

yes its a commercial, I'm an actor...all the interest is fascinating,

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The 93rd floor......

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2009/09/93rd-floor.html

Larry van der Lubberstein

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2009/09/larry-van-der-lubbenstein.html

-------------------------------------------------(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)