Thursday, February 4, 2010

Don't touch the Ratlines of Washington, D.C.

From an exchange of comments with Douglas Willinger in

The Right of Mobility

http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2010/01/right-of-mobility.html
.....................
avles said...

when I opened again blogger, some minutes ago, I found it still logged. I am very careful when I end a session. Maybe this I didn't unlog but ....I think they have stolen my password and probably they were in my blog, to manipulate it."why you don't change password?" you would ask to me...Simple: I can't trust no more blogger. After the last time, two years ago, when they blocked my blog just as I was improving it following their insturctions, I believe now that if I would change password I simply will lose any capability to use the blogs.Technical anomalies are only the hypocrite disguise for the Counter Reformation Inquisition.

2/02/2010 11:13 AM
Douglas A. Willinger said...

I would not totally trust any of these services, and do not trust the future post feature (which never works for me anyway), as anything uploaded but not publisheded can be viewed by minions ofthe apostate within intelligence.Did you see this post of mine regarding the controlled 'muckracker' Neil DeMause of 'Fields of SChemes"?http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2006/10/vindictiveness-of-rcc-in-electronic.html (*)DeMause is a fake who sucks up to Rome, who contacted me in Sept 2004 in response to my newsnet postings about apostate (nationals ballpark stadium) stadium in DC, and feined interest in publishing the story only to never do so.Do see the months archives which that article appears:http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2006_10_01_archive.html (**)This whole South Capitol Mall issie is really an eyeopener to the extent of Rome's subversion of society, particularly revealing of the phony 'environmentalist' organizations.

2/02/2010 12:11 PM
..........(*)...........
http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2006/10/vindictiveness-of-rcc-in-electronic.html:
Friday, October 27, 2006

2006 Timeline:February 5, 2006I make a private email to an internet writer of stadium issues, Neil De Mause, of Fields of Schemes, questioning “certain institutions” for mucking up the planning of our Nation’s Capital for greed.March 8, 2006I begin receiving email from Verio, my internet service provider for my web sites http://www.HIghwaysAndCommunities.com and http://www.HIghwaysAndCommunities.com/southcapitolstreetwith an invoice problem upping my $29.95 monthly charge to $599.00March 17, 2006I made a public post questioning the role of the Roman Catholic Church in the planning for South Capitol Street in response to a misleading post by Neil De Mause on yahoo.stadiums.newsgroups.

--- stadiums@yahoogroups.com wrote: > 6.Field of Schemes Update: D.C. development> to lag behind stadium> From: neil@demause.net> > Message: 6Date: 17 Mar 2006 15:48:46 -0000 From: neil@demause.netSubject: Field of Schemes

Update: D.C. development to lag behind stadium (snip)

Before condos are built and stores opened, major transportation improvements are necessary, including a $20 million renovation of the Navy Yard Metro station.The D.C. Department of Transportation is about to spend $625 million to expand South Capitol Street and rebuild the Frederick Douglass Bridge.---

Neil: South Capitol Street is to be"expanded"???

This is news to me as every report that I have seen shows theplanners retaining the existing narrow (30') streetright of way width, as I have pointed out to you and others with my web site on that area's planning at: http://www.HighwaysAndCommunities.com

That planning decision was ostensibly done to save dwellings to the west of South Capitol Street; however these are shown removed and replaced by much larger buildings in National Capitol Planning Commission’s2005 report. That decision will deny any linear greenway for South Capitol Street; it will complicate if not stop the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative plans for a parallel vehicular tunnel.

That decisions’ primary beneficiary are the owners of the one and only significant building along this corridor that will survive the redevelopment: the Archdiocese of Washington's St. Paul de Vincent Church at the northeast quadrant of South Capitol and M Streets. http://www.highwaysandcommunities.com/southcapitolstreet/South_Capitol_Street_Question_of_St_Vincents_Church.htm

Note that in my interpretation of the Legacy greenway concept, that I have that Church structure retained at its historic context at this intersection, with itsstructure shifted several hundred feet to the east to accommodate the greenway and tunnel. Stuff like this has already been done: in 1969 the oldest Jewish synagogue was moved 5 blocks to accommodate WMATAsubway construction. Here's something I would like your help on. In the past, where there have been such conflicts, one can find newspaper articles, such as the D.C. I-395 routing north of K Street that is curved to avoid the Bibleway Church on New Jersey Avenue, and the aborted1960 plans to route I-95 into D.C. through the Catholic Sisters properties. But I can not find a single newspaper article on the role of the Roman Catholic Church authorities in the planning for the South Capitol Street, even though I have been told by fellow attendees at the National Building Museum that individuals from the Archdioceseof Washington, did express their absolute opposition to any moving of the St. Vincent De Paul Church structure.

Could you and any one else, please indicate what news accounts exist about this. It would definitely make an excellent and extremely appropriate story for a Neil de Mause Field's of Schemes write-up. CheersDouglas A. Willingerhttp://www.HighwaysAndCommunities.com/southcapitolstreet(the web site about the botching of the planning forSouthCapitol Street)

That received no reply; to the best of my knowledge, Neil de Mause has yet to write any such story either in stadiums@yahoo.groups, nor in his Field of Schemes web site. I find this notable since de Mause had contacted me hours after my initial September 2004 internet posts about the stadium blocking the South Mall, expressing interest in this story.March 28, 2006My “PATRIOT” Act - U.S. Department of Security ID-financial file is checked out by someone (I don’t know who). I found this out upon opening a bank account recently.“PATRIOT” may mean “Pry And Treat Roughly In Our Turf”?March 29, 2006I start my blog http://wwwsouthcapitolstreet.blogspot.com with the post Choices.”

Strange automobiles begin appearing in my family’s house driveway; we (my Mother and myself) have seen what appear to be airport taxi (un-stretched limo) pulled all the way down the driveway, past the sidewalk to the front door where he could be seen from inside the house, to a blind spot next to the garage doors and operating a lap top computer; my mother goes out to inquire, the driver says he is looking for “Mr. Brown” and speeds off.

This is the first happening of this in 6 years at that address, and such misplaced automobiles begin to show up intermittingly through Spring and into the Summer.April – July 2006I make numerous posts about the South Capitol Street corridor planning, with some of these mentioning the St. Vincent de Paul Church.July 22, 2006At 11.11 AM, I make a post “Physical Realities”.

It shows the St. Vincent DePaul Roman Catholic Church and the new office building going up behind it at 20 M Street SE preventing the church building’s easiest relocation, owned by the man who was selected to purchase the Washington Nationals baseball franchise, juxtapositioned with the man over the St. Vincent de Paul Church, Theodore Lerner and Theodore McCarrick.5 hours later, my mother opens and steps outside the front door and sees a strange automobile stopping in front, with the driver staring and pointing directly at our house; he speeds off.(The house is on a dead end street, making it easier to notice such vehicles).This was not a daily experience during the blog’s 4 month, 6 day duration of posts. But it became an occurrence shortly after whenever I made a post spot lighting St. Vincent de Paul Church.The ambush itself occurred at about 2:30 AM, August 5, 2006.

Because of the timing of things, including my blog’s post of July 22, 2006 “Physical Realities” which includes a photo of Washington Cardinal Theodore McCarrick (who retired May 2006), and the simple fact that St. Vincent de Paul Church is a Roman Catholic Church, this suggests to me that the entity that I have pissed off is the Roman Catholic Church.The fact that no one else touches this South Capitol Mall issue – that it has gone entirely unreported by the “mainstream” media as if the issue was taboo to report or discuss -- adds to this outlook. So does the following.
Posted by Douglas A. Willinger at 1:49 PM
Labels: , ,
...........(**)..........

http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2006/10/severely-vindictive-nature-of-rcc.html

Friday, October 27, 2006

My recent time-line suggestive of an illegal use of U.S. Department of Homeland Security as revenge for internet writings questioning the role of Roman Catholic Church hierarchy with killing the South Capitol Mall, perks my reaction to the October 11, 2006 posting in a blog “Wispers in the Loggia” of a letter calling for the resignation of New York Archbishop Edward Egan:
October 2006Dear Brother Priest:A Committee of Concerned Clergy for the Archdiocese of New York has met to discuss the critical condition of the Archdiocese of New York. As you would understand, because of the severely vindictive nature of Cardinal Egan,this committee must remain anonymous. This letter is being sent to many priests throughout the Archdiocese so that at each Vicariate meeting a formal vote of “NO Confidence” can be exercised with regard to Cardinal Edward Egan in his role as Archbishop of New York. As you know, the collective memory of the presbyterate cannot recall a time in recent history when the morale of priests has been so broken and low. Some of our elderly priests can well recall the Cardinal Spellman years. Many remember the tenure of Cardinal Cooke and certainly everyone remembers Cardinal O’Connor. At no time has the relationship between the Ordinary and the priests of the Archdiocese been so fractured and seemingly hopeless as it is now.Since his arrival in New York, the Cardinal has given his time, attention and interest to matters financial while paying little or no attention to the spiritual needs and concerns of the priests and faithful of the Archdiocese. During the last six years the Priests of the Archdiocese of New York have been patient, understanding, tolerant and loyal. Several attempts have been made to open avenues of communication with the Cardinal but to avail. During the last six years, the Cardinal’s relations with the Priests of New York have been defined by dishonesty, deception, disinterest and disregard. Far too many of our brothers can speak personally of the arrogant and cavalier manner in which they have been treated by the Cardinal. Early in his tenure, the cruel and ruthless way in which several priests who served on the seminary faculty were dismissed, was an adumbration of how many other priests would also be treated. Time and again, the Cardinal fails to be the Father that every bishop must be to his priests.With regard to important policies and decisions that impact upon the welfare of the Archdiocese, it is evident that the Cardinal does not seek advice or counsel from the many competent and experienced priests who so faithfully serve as pastors and members of his chancery staff. Instead, it is regrettably and seemingly apparent that the Cardinal relies on the advice of his priest-secretary [Msgr Gregory Mustaciuolo] who enjoys a most limited and meager pastoral experience.The Fifth Anniversary of September 11th was a sad reminder of the Cardinal’s decision to leave New York only two days after the attack, during a time when the city desperately needed a spiritual leader. How sad, painful and disappointing it was to hear the tabloids referring to the then Mayor Giuliani as the “Shepherd of the City”. Since that time, the Cardinal has continued to fail in his role as Shepherd. Pope John Paul II referred to New York as the Capital of the World. How unfortunate it is that the voice of the Archbishop of New York is almost never heard in that “Capital”. The Cardinal demonstrates an unnatural fear of the media and he forfeits the great opportunity to employ the media as a means of addressing the many contemporary questions of faith and morals. It is unthinkable that in this millennium a Successor to the Apostles would shrink from such a valuable opportunity for evangelization and hide himself within the walls of his residence.Sadly, it is evident that this Cardinal is unable to deal with the complexities, problems and challenges of an Archdiocese of the magnitude and diversity of New York. For these reasons and more, the Priests of the Archdiocese of New York must express a vote of NO CONFIDENCE. Such a vote would encourage the Papal Nuncio and the Holy Father to strongly consider accepting the Cardinal’s resignation in April,2007, when he reaches the age of retirement, rather than at a future and uncertain date before his 80th birthday, as can often be the case with retiring Cardinals. The search for a new Archbishop should begin sooner rather than later. Rome must know that the priests and people of New York desperately need a Bishop who will be “strong, loving and wise” (II Timothy: 1:7): a Bishop who will love his priests, seeing them as his spiritual sons and faithful assistants: a Bishop who will begin the healing that is so desperately needed in this Archdiocese: a Bishop who will preach and teach without fear of seeing his name in a newspaper: a Bishop who will truly see holiness in Truth.The Committee suggests that at each vicariate meeting a secret ballot be taken in which each priest who is present could vote. It was thought that only priests and no deacons should participate in this vote. The votes should be counted at that meeting and the tally registered on the enclosed form. The form should be signed by two witnesses and a copy sent to each of the Vicars General. It would be incumbent upon the Vicars General to report the vote to the Papal Nuncio. At this important and critical moment, let us move forward with prayerful courage.After prayeful consideration, I cast my vote as:NO CONFIDENCE in Cardinal Egan: _____CONFIDENCE in Cardinal Egan:_____ABSTENTION: ______------------------------------------------------------------------------Each Vicariate should send a copy of this form to each of the Vicars General-Vicariate: ____________________________Date of Meeting:________________________Number of Priests in attendance: ____________Number voting - NO CONFIDENCE: __________Number voting – CONFIDENCE: _____________Number voting – ABSTENTION: _____________These vote was taken and counted in the presence of all those in attendance at the Vicariate meeting.Witnessed by:___________________ __________________http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2006_10_01_archive.html“… because of the severely vindictive nature of Cardinal Egan, this committee must remain anonymous …”
Indeed. From my perspective, look what happens to someone who uses his real name!So we are to become a nation of people afraid to link their names to their writings, lest some powerful well connected entity get to sic the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on them with warrant less searches of any electronically stored data.The U.S. Department of Homeland Security surely is an effective means to potentially render the general citizenry as blackmail able as a career politician.This will especially be felt later for those born into the internet age. Just imagine having everything you’ve written accessible forever because you typed it into an electronic device- email, IM, web sites, search engines, on line dating and pornography services, anything.
...........(**)..........

And what about Washington Archbishop Theordore McCarrick (retired May 2006) and/or his successor and from below or above?

http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2006/10/and-what-about-washington-archbishop.htmlFriday, October 27, 2006
Theodore E. McCarrick
McCarrick's successor's biography:http://www.adw.org/about/lead_bio_wuerl.aspDid either of these men “press the button” on me through U.S. Department of Homeland Security?I don’t know, one way or the other.What I do know:That they are not the only people within the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy. Perhaps it was done by others within that hierarchy at some level or another, perhaps even from Rome? Or perhaps at a lower level?That it is a Roman Catholic Church at the northeast corner of South Capitol and M Streets in Washington, D.C. – St. Vincent De Paul Church -- that is the most architecturally significant building along that north south corridor to the south of the SW/SE Freeway;That there has been nothing in the media that I have found about any negotiations that occurred between government and Roman Catholic Church hierarchy regarding that Church’s future, nor the conflict with National Capitol Planning Commission’s Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capital for the 21st Century South Capitol Street Frederick Douglass Mall.That Theodore McCarrick appears on the list of Catholic University of America Board of Trustees, along with Mark Tuohey, Chairman of the D.C. Sports and Entertainment Commission. I know this from researching them via the internet, aka finding their names on the CUA web site, though I am not aware of any journalist accounts mentioning, let alone discussing, this. http://publicaffairs.cua.edu/factbook/trustees.htmIt's a list that does not include McCarrick's sucessor Wuerl, but which does include New York Cardinal Eagin.I have not seen either the names of Wuerl nor Eagin appear in anything regarding the Washington Nationals.I do not know McCarrick’s exact role in the affairs regarding the Washington Nationals and their atrociously placed Stadium. But his name does appear with Tuohey and a list of figures staring with Condoleezza Rice, in that September 18, 2005 article in The Washington Times of wealthy baseball backers.
“It’s all about building relationships.” Mr. Tuohey said one humid night in his large suite, where he has entertained guests from Capitol Hill as well as Cardinal Theodore McCarrick and Eddie Johnson, coach of the Wizards. “is this a good place to do that? The answer is yes.”http://www.washingtontimes.com/familytimes/20050917-104942-2368r.htm
Who were these "guests from Capitol Hill? The Washington Times article fails to say.The placement of Nationals Stadium obviously essentially extends the building line of St. Vincent De Paul Church southward, blocking off the eastern half of the South Capitol Mall.Was perhaps Theodore Lerner’s placement of his 20 M Street project a favor to McCarrick to buttress St. Vincent de Paul Church’s existing placement, perhaps so that McCarrick could use his influence to have Lerner “selected” as the owner of the Nationals? Or was this just a coincidence?Who knows?And what about the acquiescence of the U.S. government?Why no accounting to the public of the identities of the government officials that sold out our South Capitol Mall?
Posted by Douglas A. Willinger at 2:01 PM
Labels: , ,
.....................
The IAO caught the attention of many observers because of its use of the Masonic eye-in-pyramid symbol in its original logo. That logo featured the eye of Providence from the Great Seal of the United States gazing at the Earth, and the Latin motto scientia est potentia, meaning "knowledge is power". In addition, "Iao" is another name for a gnostic supreme deity and sun-god, the Demiurge which is purportedly referred to in Masonic ritual. The pyramid has 13 steps, the same of that on the the US 1 dollar bill Note that the thing is to the "back and to the left" of the globe, as well as on the U.S. $1 bill, as a divine irony symbolizing the secretive Jesuit-Masonic ruling elite.

Rat-lines in Trieste

Rat-lines in Washington, D.C.

-------------------------------------------------(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)
at 3:28 AM
Labels: , ,