What are your views on the controversy over the Ground Zero mosque, or as it’s also been described, the Islamic cultural centre in New York?
I don’t have all the facts here, but the plan is to build a 15-storey centre and this is a Muslim project, even if it’s called a Cordoba centre and it’s for everyone and not only for Muslims. It is two blocks from Ground Zero with a mosque for 2,000 people and so on. Even if you say this project aims to build a greater understanding and a new dialogue with American Christians and so on, it is evident that any normal person will fear it. Ninety percent of the population will fear this project more than be attracted by it, even if Feisal Abdul Rauf – the imam responsible for the project – says it’s not aggressive. But humanly and sociologically speaking, you are putting up something where you destroyed something; you are putting up a Muslim tower and pretending that this will be a tower of peace and so on. It is psychologically wrong.
.....But pushes forward the right theology. "Ninety percent" means that the natural religious trouble between Muslims and not-Muslims in the Western societies imported via immigration policy (= ethnic-religious weapon of Rome), will destroy the "secular" (= based on Lutheran separation between "church" and "state") basis of the same Western world. The Religgion (= church of Rome), in order to overwhelm that Lutheran separation (modern state of rights), must create an uncontrollable religious conflict inside the same West. societies, uncontrollable by the usual secular institutions, which in a preventive way are filled with criminality and corruption, Mafias and Camorras. Corruption and criminality paralyze and destroy any eventual serious and succesfull secular answer containing a true religious content, secular answer implemented to defuse homicidal 'religious' troubles (imported via Islamic immigration) which have secret secular goals (suck all the temporal powers of the lay instituitions in order to give it to the priests of Rome; in Africa all that is called: "Roman Catholic charitable missionary work") .
Some would argue that the 9/11 bombers were not real Muslims, but fundamentalist ideologues and terrorists?
Yes but this is the wrong position because radical Muslims are true Muslims. I’m not saying that the true Islam is bin Laden, this is not my opinion. But I would contend that bin Laden is a true Muslim – a true Muslim.
Result: everyone is a true Muslim. Here the Jesuits are in difficulties because they have complicated contradictions to solve to push away their global marketing policy of the Islam with the image of the "Two Islams". One is the "Bad Islam" of Bin Laden which is born under the influx of the "neocons" (the eternal enemies of the church of Rome, Jews & Protestants). On the other side of the barricade there's the "Right Islam" of the ones who fought those "neocons" (Jews & Protestants), their aggressions and influx in the "Right Islam". Contradictions arise when this image manufactured by Society of Loyola and aimed to target a Western mind market, clashes with the other image of Islam manufactured for the same Islamic mind market, where the Jesuits are trying to squeeze also the Bin Laden lemon in order to suck from it further drops of Islamic support and symphaties to their 'ecumenical' initiatives. Problems of the noosphere (internet). It was a Jesuit to invent it - de Chardin.Pastor Terry Jones [the evangelical pastor who has threatened to burn the Koran] cannot say he’s truly representing Christianity because you cannot find anything in the Gospel that says that.
Agree. In fact the destruction of nations, ethnics, pursued by the immigration blessed by the colonels of Jesuits, those bishops of CEI or their colleague in America, is not contained in the Jesus' Gospel. And in fact the priests of Rome knows that. They know that the immigration, destroying nations ethnics, etc. is something not-Christian (to not say anti-Christian). In fact Jesus Christ is universal, and universality has a significance only with differences. Rome wants the destruction of these differences, but is not so stupid to announce it on the papal newspaper Osservatore Romano. So they blesses the immigrates in order to let the ignorant to do the dirty job without to know what he is doing (to invade other countries - pushed by opportune starvation policies - and to create in the West. societies the opportune crisis of ethnic, religious and anthroplogical identity). This is the true reason why the colonels of Rome bless the immigrate - not because the melting pot is Christian, but because with the immigration and related chaos etc. the invasion "know not what it does" (Luke 23:34). And after having doing things without to know it, it arrives the beatification because the material immigration is the collective 'good' Roman Catholic indulgence which is pushing forward the Counter Reformation agenda of Rome. Catholicism is simply the universalism of Jesus Christ used by the Romanists against itself. The fact that they uses a foreign, alien language ("catholic" in Greek lang. means "universal") for the same concept , is a brilliant proof......
But all the positions of radical Muslims you’ll find in the Koran and in the tradition. You’ll find other positions, but this is one, and one that is very strongly presented in the Koran and in the Sunnah. Nine-eleven was a Muslim action even if for apologetic reasons, it’s said that this was a terrorist action and terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, that Islam means peace and so on.
Let’s take the small example of this week. The pastor said burn the Koran. I said to a Palestinian imam friend of mine in northern Italy
Here you see finally the true 'universalism' of the church of Rome and its Jesuits. From the National Socialists to the Fascists, from the Communists to the Democrats, from the fans of David Icke to the disciples of professor Corrado Malanga, from the Ecologists to the Atheists, this is the final Roman Universal Melting-pot in the name of the "defence" against the "Zionist and American global threat" (= against Judaism and Reform). All those pieces of human potatoes coocked in the World Melting-pot of Rome are tied together with the Jesuit sauce of the hate towards Jews and Protestants. They are all pardoned by Rome for their 'deviation' from the Jesus Gospel because all them "know not what they do" (Luke 23.24). And after their material actions have been pardoned they are sanctified because the little insects of the divine emperor of Rome worked in sincere and beate ignorance to gain more glory to H.I.S. blaspheme Catholic empire on the whole earth.........that in my opinion he [Jones] is a stupid person.
Sincere, ignorant, and especially stupid. Jesuit humor at pleasure here.But what’s the reaction in Pakistan? They destroyed three churches yesterday and say they will destroy more. Why do they not respond differently? Why did they not respond to Ratzinger’s speech with a speech?
Because when they'll end the dirty job you could give the guilty to those "neocons" (= Jews & Protestants) for having instigated the "Bad Islam".If someone is saying burn the Koran, this is stupid, this is wrong.
Again: a stupid is a sincere ignorant. Let's pardon him (Luke 23:34). And if his stupidity will gain more glory to our divine emperor of Rome, let's make out of him a beate (like Alojze Grozde). The official world competition "The best Roman Catholic good action" is officially open.But to show you it’s wrong, why not say: ‘OK, I will not burn the Gospel’ or ‘I will burn the Gospel.’
In fact from some days I am anxiously asking to myself (probably the only individual on the planet): It was the Jesuit order and the Council of Trent to exterminate Protestants like our friend Terry Jones for example in France in 1572, not Muslims, why he doesn't burn a copy of the Cathechism of the Council of Trent in front of the Catholic cathedrals? Should I, a lay, soon or later, to burn a copy of it in front of the headquarter of the Jesuits in Trieste? Or in the most adequate scenario of the saint Just cathedral? No, at the opposite, Roman Catholics are the true ones linked with the stakes of books (and other....). I would tear the pages of their Cathechism to roll 'em - toelette paper to clean from the Reform the squirts of the Counter Reformation scum.(See "a New St. Bartholomew Massacre Day (or Year) near the corner? "http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2010/09/new-st-bartholomews-day-massacre-is.html)These are two legitimate positions. That’s all. But the reaction is we will kill, destroy, and you hear this is everyday. Almost every week you have an attack from the Sunni against the Shia, especially against the Shia, or the Shia against the Amadiah. Where do they take this from? They take it from the Muslim tradition. Saudi Arabia is doing the same… This reaction is in Islam, it’s not the best of Islam, but it is there.
Good Islam, Bad Islam.So I think the reaction of Obama was a political one, and not a reasonable, humanist answer even if he tries to present it as that. The answer of the mayor of New York is also a political one to gain for himself Muslim votes but probably it’s bad politics because he will lose maybe more votes among Jews and non-Muslims.
To land for a moment from the theological sphere on the most concrete daily political sphere, here the Jesuits demonstrates another face, the purely political face, of immigration. Why so too much Catholics immigrates in USA, blessed by the pope? But simply because America must become the Germany of this century. After the Holy See and Jesuits putted their Roman Catholic Hitler at power in Berlin, they instigated the half Roman Catholic Germany against him, not only to detect the Roman Catholics who were anti-Nazi in order to 'neutralize' them, but also to blackamil their Adolph: "Adolph! Do this, do that, make this, make that..... What? You don't agree?... Well, we'll make explode the half Roman Catholic Germany, we'll destroy your - pardon! our regime and we will substitute you with a Bolshevik dictator of ours, from the Communists of Munich, the ones you hate too much... Ok, we are seeing that now you agree with us!". Of course they used the same system with Egg-head Benito Mussolini (with the loosing of Azione Cattolica). The same system the Council of Trent is applying today with Berlusconi, using Famiglia Cristiana magazine and CEI (and supported by the centre-left and radical extreme left oppositions). And finally it is the same system they are using with that black president of America surrounded by Jesuit advicers.... It is very easy to manipulate dictators!Why? Because it’s unreasonable…That’s why I say I understand the fear of many people, not only Americans, in saying it’s not reasonable. If you go to the site of a European Arab centre in Paris, you’ll see comments from Muslims from all over Europe. Six out of seven say it’s wrong.
"Six out of seven".Here you have the allusion (occult of course) to Wladimir Ledochowsky. What allusion? I am tired to write, see my messages about the number "67" and the farce of the Milan cathedral on Berlusconi's face:Saturday, December 26, 2009Voice of Berlus-Osiris from the Underworld praising the 67th anniversary http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2009/12/voice-of-berlus-osiris-from-underworld.htmlOne comment from an American Muslim was very clear. It’s not a very important site, it’s official but not many people go there, but I read all the answers and they were very clear.
It's the Council of Trent's marketing, stupid!
Link (here) to the National Catholic Reporter
More on Fr. Samir Khalil Samir, S.J. (here) , (here) and (here)......................
------------------------------------------------(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)Thursday, September 17, 2009
Rifqa Bary of Pordenone (Vatican Apennine peninsula)
http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2009/09/rifqa-bary-of-pordenone-apennine.html".....Some weeks ago, the director of the prison of the city of Trieste, the prison known with the name of the street where it is located, “Jail of Coroneo street”, in an article appeared on the local Jesuit-Masonic daily “Il Piccolo” (the day before the 21st anniversary of the Massacre of Ramstein), intervening about the problem of the overcrowding of the Italian jails whose prisoners are for the great part foreigners, stated that the Islamic prisoners are “correct, respectful towards the authority and towards the rules” and the “self-discipline” is very strong among them.The Roman Catholic knight of Malta head of the Schutz Staffeln, Heinrich Himmler, after seven decades finally found a man, the director of “Coroneo Jail” of Trieste Enrico Sbriglia, who recognized the great value and truthfulness of his opinion, for which the Islam was (is) a good religion in order to push the soldier to fight a war and, of course, what he meant was "our war". I totally agree with both guys Heinrich and Enrico, in fact the Roman Catholic Hitler and his Himmler agreed to create in the Balkans divisions built up with Balkanian Muslim SS, where finally the Coran could do its work at the side of his ally, the perverted, corrupted and manipulated Ustasha 'bible':.............""............Oh! Look! Also the "Coroneo Jail" is a piece of the world which needs its 'mission'. Jesuit priest Silvio Alaimo belonging to the 500 feet far away Jesuit church, is the chaplain of the jail where the Muslims are so "....correct, respectful towards the authority and towards the rules!..", practically like diligent soldiers of an army. Is Jesuit priest Silvio Alaimo of the military order of Loyola their chaplain or their...... captain?.........................".....................It's a new St. Bartholomew Day's Massacre, stupid!
