My perspective - I

>Short comments about posts, articles, etc. on the Jesuits NWO – as said by D. Willinger, "from a North Adriatic perspective".1) Video of James Sandlin on Jesuit Papacy’s Assassination of President Kennedy, 1963From Vatian Assassins site of Eric John Phelps: http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2010/11/video-of-james-sandlin-on-jesuit-papacys-assassination-of-president-kennedy-1963/After having created FED, CIA, etc., the RCC wanted to appear as not guilty. They chose a Roman Catholic, they pushed him to dismantle all those abominions of Rome, but they stopped him before to conclude the work. Moral: a Roman Catholic tried to reform the USA, but was stopped by "obscure forces". For the law of the opposites, those "obscure forces" are only the enemies of the Roman Catholicism. Guess whom. I am convinced of that because the refined allegory between the JFK assassination and Abraham Lincoln assassination are too much elaborated for being a product of the Quantum Mechanical statistical universe. It is now part of the conspiracy folklore the impressive similarity between dates, names of secretaries, etc. All that has been engineered to give the impression of a sort of "Protestant revenge" for the Lincoln assassination. Conclusion: "Protestant defended their FED, their CIA, their Vietnam war, etc. from a pious Roman Catholic president who even assured the Protestant priest he would have not given credit to his pope in Rome in taking political decisions (*)". A refined manufacturing of the religious image and the re-building of historical allusions. It doesn't matter how much priest of the church of Rome are involved. This message has been manufactured for the rest of the world, and especially for the RC one. You can rely on me, because I have a direct experience about the propaganda fallout of the JFK assassination in the old world. "America remains America" for the local zombies. And American priests are not like European/Italian priests. It is the national attribute the most important.A propos Viet-nam war. I think it is not convincing the idea that the general superior wanted to spread Roman Catholicism with tanks and F4 Phantom. Of course some Roman Catholic tactical manipulation of the local societies occured, but not strategical ones. The target of the strategy could have well been another one. Always manufactured for the world psychological market. The Vietnam war was the first live-broadcasted war. It had the same goal of the invasion of Irak and Afghanistan by Bush (and Afghanista by the Soviets): to rise hate against America and to create inner political/social/cultural crisis, where the Jesuits' hof would have picked up flesh for their teeth. After the WWII, America had still a fame related with the efforts to free Europe from Nazism. Part of that fame was spent in the Cold War (Hoax), where America was the "Freedom Fighter" in the world against Communist totalitarianism. It was also that fame the true target.2) "Ali Agca: Vatican ordered hit on Pope John Paul II" by MaximilianoFrom The Unhived Mind Ii->WORLD CONTROL->The Society of Jesus (Jesuit Order) of Craig Oxley: http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?s=2d3e358d441d56c5f11b11c2414d7614&showtopic=44754Pope Wojtyla attempt of assassination. A person, Mr X, told me that he had the sequent information from a Carabineer military policeman who belonged to the services protecting the Polish pope: the man hit by the bullets in saint Peter square was a sosia of Karol Wojtyla. If this is true, it would confirm what I believe to be the truth behind that attempt of assassination. When the Jesuits and their Holy See were going to destroy the old order of the Cold War (Hoax), they needed to have an insurance against attempts to restore it. Like the "persecutions" of Roman Catholics by Hitler, when opportune rallies of Romanists under the control of bishop von Galen in some cities of the Roman Catholic Deutschland built the insurance of Pacelli and Ledochowsky in order to avoid their National Socialist androids running out of control. The insurance was consisting in to show to the eyes of that Roman Catholic corporal from Austria what consequences he would have met in case he would have forgotten that his absolute masters were – first – Pacelli and, over both ones, Wlodimir Ledochowsky: a total riot in the half Roman Catholic Germany. Similarly, half century later, the "Black Madonna" in Poland, and then the "KGB"-led attempt to murder a pope, were other kind of insurances, which would have remained to the gangs at the Kremline the consequences of a disobedience. When you have at disposition a billion, a billion and half of Roman Catholics, you can allow to yourself such tricks (today they have also an equal number of Chinese and an equal number of Muslims on their sides - troubles between "Christians" and Islam or between the "official" and the "Roman" church in China are only: sand-in-the-eyes). They chose a Turkish guy, because all that could have been also interpreted like a "warning of the Turkish military Mafia" against a changing of the world order, from which they would have lost the fabolous earnings gained by their role of "protectors of the Western world against Bolshevism". Remember who was an important part of the team which built this farce, it was the Gang of Magliana, a local very powerful criminal gang of Rome with an explicit Clergy-Fascist ideology. Its boss, Enrico de Pedis, was involved with the kidnapping of the daughters of two families of Vatican employees. After his death for a settling of scores, he was buried in the Roman Catholic basilica saint Appollinare, among popes, bishops, saints of Rome (**). It was especially the kidnapping of Emmanuela Orlandi (who never came back) the one always linked, by the Italian public and private media controlled by the Holy See, with the "Eastern services", with KGB. An important Italian functionary, the public prosecutor Ferdinando Imposimato (If I am not wrong as regard the name), supported the theory of the "KGB warning" against the pope who wanted the demolishion of the Warsaw Pact and Communism. Ferdinando Imposimato and his colleague Clementina Forleo are explicitly anti-American, as their opinion about the Irak war in a book clearly witnesses. Two ideologues of the criminal Roman Catholic World Democratic government.(*) From EndrTimes blog of Arsenio: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - "What is the "W" for?"http://endrtimes.blogspot.com/2010/11/what-is-w-for.html".........In contrast to America's only acknowledged Catholic president ever:"In 1960, John Kennedy went from Washington to Texas to assure Protestant preachers he would not obey the pope. In 2001, George Bush came from Texas up to Washington to assure a group of Catholic Bishops he would obey the pope." Washington Times, April 16, 2001.http://www.rense.com/general66/midfin.htm...........".(**) May 4 2007, 05:08 PM - The Vatican Blesses The Crime: The Case Of Enrico, De Pedis - by avleshttp://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=25346"..........http://www.rifondazione-cinecitta.org/banda-magliana.html“….I believe that exists an organization composed by a few men who are able to blackmail many persons (note of Avles: don’t you feel a ‘buzzing’ in the ears? Secret Instructions…). They are more powerful than secret and security services (again the buzzing…). From ten, fifteen years it works in Italy a real agency, composed by a limited number of people able to manage the big organizations of the crime world, an agency rich of information elements with whom can influence on different ambient at every level….”“…. The prefect remembered that was just what he defined as ‘Crime Agency’ the one which supplied documents with the same stamp, stolen by the same post office, to the mafioiso Pippo Calò, to a Red Brigade terrorist and to a guerrilla member of the OLP. A structure which is similar too much to the one of the ‘Noto Servizio’ or of the ‘Anello’misterious organizations encountered in the massacre of Brescia and during the Moro kidnapping, or to the mysterious structure about whom the anonymous source of SISMI (Italian Intelligence of that time) referred to the Craxi (head of Socialist Party of Italy and prime minister), whose agents seemed in contact with a superior central, inside the one more languages were spoken, just as the ‘uncomfortable’ general Delfino Francesco. At the top of this agency it seems to be hidden a big puppet showman (note of Avles: Hans Peter Kolvenbach? The Italian provincial Francesco Tata or predecessors?) able to manipulate terrorist organizations of different colours, but also the organization which leads to the Mafia. From the MAR of Fumagalli (extreme right eversion) to the Red Brigades of Mario Moretti, from the Sicilian Mafia of Pippo Calò to the Camorra of Cutolo, then ‘adjusted trials, rigged expert judgements, passports to fugitives, false stamps for falsification of documents, airplanes of the secret services, weapon and ammunitions for every purpose….”“….what was the nature of this strange and powerful organization? In doing the disconcerting declarations, Sica has not stated precisely that, but in his later years in the Roman Procure he worked with numerous inquires which in a way or in the other way, no matter if related to Senzani’s Red Brigades or to some homicides occurred in the Roman criminal organizations, led straight forword to the sort of Italian Spectre whose operative arm was the Banda della Magliana gang, the mysterious gang of the capital become powerful between the end of the ‘70ies and the beginning of the ‘80ies….”............".-----------------------(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

Don't touch the Ratlines of Washington, D.C.

From an exchange of comments with Douglas Willinger in

The Right of Mobility

http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2010/01/right-of-mobility.html

.....................

avles said...

when I opened again blogger, some minutes ago, I found it still logged. I am very careful when I end a session. Maybe this I didn't unlog but ....I think they have stolen my password and probably they were in my blog, to manipulate it."why you don't change password?" you would ask to me...Simple: I can't trust no more blogger. After the last time, two years ago, when they blocked my blog just as I was improving it following their insturctions, I believe now that if I would change password I simply will lose any capability to use the blogs.Technical anomalies are only the hypocrite disguise for the Counter Reformation Inquisition.

2/02/2010 11:13 AM

Douglas A. Willinger said...

I would not totally trust any of these services, and do not trust the future post feature (which never works for me anyway), as anything uploaded but not publisheded can be viewed by minions ofthe apostate within intelligence.Did you see this post of mine regarding the controlled 'muckracker' Neil DeMause of 'Fields of SChemes"?http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2006/10/vindictiveness-of-rcc-in-electronic.html (*)DeMause is a fake who sucks up to Rome, who contacted me in Sept 2004 in response to my newsnet postings about apostate (nationals ballpark stadium) stadium in DC, and feined interest in publishing the story only to never do so.Do see the months archives which that article appears:http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2006_10_01_archive.html (**)This whole South Capitol Mall issie is really an eyeopener to the extent of Rome's subversion of society, particularly revealing of the phony 'environmentalist' organizations.

2/02/2010 12:11 PM

..........(*)...........

Vindictiveness of RCC in the electronic age of US Department of Homeland Security

http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2006/10/vindictiveness-of-rcc-in-electronic.html:

Friday, October 27, 2006

2006 Timeline:February 5, 2006I make a private email to an internet writer of stadium issues, Neil De Mause, of Fields of Schemes, questioning “certain institutions” for mucking up the planning of our Nation’s Capital for greed.March 8, 2006I begin receiving email from Verio, my internet service provider for my web sites http://www.HIghwaysAndCommunities.com and http://www.HIghwaysAndCommunities.com/southcapitolstreetwith an invoice problem upping my $29.95 monthly charge to $599.00March 17, 2006I made a public post questioning the role of the Roman Catholic Church in the planning for South Capitol Street in response to a misleading post by Neil De Mause on yahoo.stadiums.newsgroups.

--- stadiums@yahoogroups.com wrote: > 6.Field of Schemes Update: D.C. development> to lag behind stadium> From: neil@demause.net> > Message: 6Date: 17 Mar 2006 15:48:46 -0000 From: neil@demause.netSubject: Field of Schemes

Update: D.C. development to lag behind stadium (snip)

Before condos are built and stores opened, major transportation improvements are necessary, including a $20 million renovation of the Navy Yard Metro station.The D.C. Department of Transportation is about to spend $625 million to expand South Capitol Street and rebuild the Frederick Douglass Bridge.---

Neil: South Capitol Street is to be"expanded"???

This is news to me as every report that I have seen shows theplanners retaining the existing narrow (30') streetright of way width, as I have pointed out to you and others with my web site on that area's planning at: http://www.HighwaysAndCommunities.com

That planning decision was ostensibly done to save dwellings to the west of South Capitol Street; however these are shown removed and replaced by much larger buildings in National Capitol Planning Commission’s2005 report. That decision will deny any linear greenway for South Capitol Street; it will complicate if not stop the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative plans for a parallel vehicular tunnel.

That decisions’ primary beneficiary are the owners of the one and only significant building along this corridor that will survive the redevelopment: the Archdiocese of Washington's St. Paul de Vincent Church at the northeast quadrant of South Capitol and M Streets. http://www.highwaysandcommunities.com/southcapitolstreet/South_Capitol_Street_Question_of_St_Vincents_Church.htm

Note that in my interpretation of the Legacy greenway concept, that I have that Church structure retained at its historic context at this intersection, with itsstructure shifted several hundred feet to the east to accommodate the greenway and tunnel. Stuff like this has already been done: in 1969 the oldest Jewish synagogue was moved 5 blocks to accommodate WMATAsubway construction. Here's something I would like your help on. In the past, where there have been such conflicts, one can find newspaper articles, such as the D.C. I-395 routing north of K Street that is curved to avoid the Bibleway Church on New Jersey Avenue, and the aborted1960 plans to route I-95 into D.C. through the Catholic Sisters properties. But I can not find a single newspaper article on the role of the Roman Catholic Church authorities in the planning for the South Capitol Street, even though I have been told by fellow attendees at the National Building Museum that individuals from the Archdioceseof Washington, did express their absolute opposition to any moving of the St. Vincent De Paul Church structure.

Could you and any one else, please indicate what news accounts exist about this. It would definitely make an excellent and extremely appropriate story for a Neil de Mause Field's of Schemes write-up. CheersDouglas A. Willingerhttp://www.HighwaysAndCommunities.com/southcapitolstreet(the web site about the botching of the planning forSouthCapitol Street)

That received no reply; to the best of my knowledge, Neil de Mause has yet to write any such story either in stadiums@yahoo.groups, nor in his Field of Schemes web site. I find this notable since de Mause had contacted me hours after my initial September 2004 internet posts about the stadium blocking the South Mall, expressing interest in this story.March 28, 2006My “PATRIOT” Act - U.S. Department of Security ID-financial file is checked out by someone (I don’t know who). I found this out upon opening a bank account recently.“PATRIOT” may mean “Pry And Treat Roughly In Our Turf”?March 29, 2006I start my blog http://wwwsouthcapitolstreet.blogspot.com with the post Choices.”

Strange automobiles begin appearing in my family’s house driveway; we (my Mother and myself) have seen what appear to be airport taxi (un-stretched limo) pulled all the way down the driveway, past the sidewalk to the front door where he could be seen from inside the house, to a blind spot next to the garage doors and operating a lap top computer; my mother goes out to inquire, the driver says he is looking for “Mr. Brown” and speeds off.

This is the first happening of this in 6 years at that address, and such misplaced automobiles begin to show up intermittingly through Spring and into the Summer.April – July 2006I make numerous posts about the South Capitol Street corridor planning, with some of these mentioning the St. Vincent de Paul Church.July 22, 2006At 11.11 AM, I make a post “Physical Realities”.

It shows the St. Vincent DePaul Roman Catholic Church and the new office building going up behind it at 20 M Street SE preventing the church building’s easiest relocation, owned by the man who was selected to purchase the Washington Nationals baseball franchise, juxtapositioned with the man over the St. Vincent de Paul Church, Theodore Lerner and Theodore McCarrick.5 hours later, my mother opens and steps outside the front door and sees a strange automobile stopping in front, with the driver staring and pointing directly at our house; he speeds off.(The house is on a dead end street, making it easier to notice such vehicles).This was not a daily experience during the blog’s 4 month, 6 day duration of posts. But it became an occurrence shortly after whenever I made a post spot lighting St. Vincent de Paul Church.The ambush itself occurred at about 2:30 AM, August 5, 2006.

Because of the timing of things, including my blog’s post of July 22, 2006 “Physical Realities” which includes a photo of Washington Cardinal Theodore McCarrick (who retired May 2006), and the simple fact that St. Vincent de Paul Church is a Roman Catholic Church, this suggests to me that the entity that I have pissed off is the Roman Catholic Church.The fact that no one else touches this South Capitol Mall issue – that it has gone entirely unreported by the “mainstream” media as if the issue was taboo to report or discuss -- adds to this outlook. So does the following.

Posted by Douglas A. Willinger at 1:49 PM

...........(**)..........

“Severely Vindictive Nature” of RCC Hierarchy as described by those within the RCC

http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2006/10/severely-vindictive-nature-of-rcc.html

Friday, October 27, 2006

My recent time-line suggestive of an illegal use of U.S. Department of Homeland Security as revenge for internet writings questioning the role of Roman Catholic Church hierarchy with killing the South Capitol Mall, perks my reaction to the October 11, 2006 posting in a blog “Wispers in the Loggia” of a letter calling for the resignation of New York Archbishop Edward Egan:

October 2006Dear Brother Priest:A Committee of Concerned Clergy for the Archdiocese of New York has met to discuss the critical condition of the Archdiocese of New York. As you would understand, because of the severely vindictive nature of Cardinal Egan,this committee must remain anonymous. This letter is being sent to many priests throughout the Archdiocese so that at each Vicariate meeting a formal vote of “NO Confidence” can be exercised with regard to Cardinal Edward Egan in his role as Archbishop of New York. As you know, the collective memory of the presbyterate cannot recall a time in recent history when the morale of priests has been so broken and low. Some of our elderly priests can well recall the Cardinal Spellman years. Many remember the tenure of Cardinal Cooke and certainly everyone remembers Cardinal O’Connor. At no time has the relationship between the Ordinary and the priests of the Archdiocese been so fractured and seemingly hopeless as it is now.Since his arrival in New York, the Cardinal has given his time, attention and interest to matters financial while paying little or no attention to the spiritual needs and concerns of the priests and faithful of the Archdiocese. During the last six years the Priests of the Archdiocese of New York have been patient, understanding, tolerant and loyal. Several attempts have been made to open avenues of communication with the Cardinal but to avail. During the last six years, the Cardinal’s relations with the Priests of New York have been defined by dishonesty, deception, disinterest and disregard. Far too many of our brothers can speak personally of the arrogant and cavalier manner in which they have been treated by the Cardinal. Early in his tenure, the cruel and ruthless way in which several priests who served on the seminary faculty were dismissed, was an adumbration of how many other priests would also be treated. Time and again, the Cardinal fails to be the Father that every bishop must be to his priests.With regard to important policies and decisions that impact upon the welfare of the Archdiocese, it is evident that the Cardinal does not seek advice or counsel from the many competent and experienced priests who so faithfully serve as pastors and members of his chancery staff. Instead, it is regrettably and seemingly apparent that the Cardinal relies on the advice of his priest-secretary [Msgr Gregory Mustaciuolo] who enjoys a most limited and meager pastoral experience.The Fifth Anniversary of September 11th was a sad reminder of the Cardinal’s decision to leave New York only two days after the attack, during a time when the city desperately needed a spiritual leader. How sad, painful and disappointing it was to hear the tabloids referring to the then Mayor Giuliani as the “Shepherd of the City”. Since that time, the Cardinal has continued to fail in his role as Shepherd. Pope John Paul II referred to New York as the Capital of the World. How unfortunate it is that the voice of the Archbishop of New York is almost never heard in that “Capital”. The Cardinal demonstrates an unnatural fear of the media and he forfeits the great opportunity to employ the media as a means of addressing the many contemporary questions of faith and morals. It is unthinkable that in this millennium a Successor to the Apostles would shrink from such a valuable opportunity for evangelization and hide himself within the walls of his residence.Sadly, it is evident that this Cardinal is unable to deal with the complexities, problems and challenges of an Archdiocese of the magnitude and diversity of New York. For these reasons and more, the Priests of the Archdiocese of New York must express a vote of NO CONFIDENCE. Such a vote would encourage the Papal Nuncio and the Holy Father to strongly consider accepting the Cardinal’s resignation in April,2007, when he reaches the age of retirement, rather than at a future and uncertain date before his 80th birthday, as can often be the case with retiring Cardinals. The search for a new Archbishop should begin sooner rather than later. Rome must know that the priests and people of New York desperately need a Bishop who will be “strong, loving and wise” (II Timothy: 1:7): a Bishop who will love his priests, seeing them as his spiritual sons and faithful assistants: a Bishop who will begin the healing that is so desperately needed in this Archdiocese: a Bishop who will preach and teach without fear of seeing his name in a newspaper: a Bishop who will truly see holiness in Truth.The Committee suggests that at each vicariate meeting a secret ballot be taken in which each priest who is present could vote. It was thought that only priests and no deacons should participate in this vote. The votes should be counted at that meeting and the tally registered on the enclosed form. The form should be signed by two witnesses and a copy sent to each of the Vicars General. It would be incumbent upon the Vicars General to report the vote to the Papal Nuncio. At this important and critical moment, let us move forward with prayerful courage.After prayeful consideration, I cast my vote as:NO CONFIDENCE in Cardinal Egan: _____CONFIDENCE in Cardinal Egan:_____ABSTENTION: ______------------------------------------------------------------------------Each Vicariate should send a copy of this form to each of the Vicars General-Vicariate: ____________________________Date of Meeting:________________________Number of Priests in attendance: ____________Number voting - NO CONFIDENCE: __________Number voting – CONFIDENCE: _____________Number voting – ABSTENTION: _____________These vote was taken and counted in the presence of all those in attendance at the Vicariate meeting.Witnessed by:___________________ __________________http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2006_10_01_archive.html“… because of the severely vindictive nature of Cardinal Egan, this committee must remain anonymous …”

Indeed. From my perspective, look what happens to someone who uses his real name!So we are to become a nation of people afraid to link their names to their writings, lest some powerful well connected entity get to sic the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on them with warrant less searches of any electronically stored data.The U.S. Department of Homeland Security surely is an effective means to potentially render the general citizenry as blackmail able as a career politician.This will especially be felt later for those born into the internet age. Just imagine having everything you’ve written accessible forever because you typed it into an electronic device- email, IM, web sites, search engines, on line dating and pornography services, anything.

...........(**)..........

And what about Washington Archbishop Theordore McCarrick (retired May 2006) and/or his successor and from below or above?

http://wwwfreespeechbeneathushs.blogspot.com/2006/10/and-what-about-washington-archbishop.htmlFriday, October 27, 2006

Theodore E. McCarrick

McCarrick's successor's biography:http://www.adw.org/about/lead_bio_wuerl.aspDid either of these men “press the button” on me through U.S. Department of Homeland Security?I don’t know, one way or the other.What I do know:That they are not the only people within the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy. Perhaps it was done by others within that hierarchy at some level or another, perhaps even from Rome? Or perhaps at a lower level?That it is a Roman Catholic Church at the northeast corner of South Capitol and M Streets in Washington, D.C. – St. Vincent De Paul Church -- that is the most architecturally significant building along that north south corridor to the south of the SW/SE Freeway;That there has been nothing in the media that I have found about any negotiations that occurred between government and Roman Catholic Church hierarchy regarding that Church’s future, nor the conflict with National Capitol Planning Commission’s Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capital for the 21st Century South Capitol Street Frederick Douglass Mall.That Theodore McCarrick appears on the list of Catholic University of America Board of Trustees, along with Mark Tuohey, Chairman of the D.C. Sports and Entertainment Commission. I know this from researching them via the internet, aka finding their names on the CUA web site, though I am not aware of any journalist accounts mentioning, let alone discussing, this. http://publicaffairs.cua.edu/factbook/trustees.htmIt's a list that does not include McCarrick's sucessor Wuerl, but which does include New York Cardinal Eagin.I have not seen either the names of Wuerl nor Eagin appear in anything regarding the Washington Nationals.I do not know McCarrick’s exact role in the affairs regarding the Washington Nationals and their atrociously placed Stadium. But his name does appear with Tuohey and a list of figures staring with Condoleezza Rice, in that September 18, 2005 article in The Washington Times of wealthy baseball backers.

“It’s all about building relationships.” Mr. Tuohey said one humid night in his large suite, where he has entertained guests from Capitol Hill as well as Cardinal Theodore McCarrick and Eddie Johnson, coach of the Wizards. “is this a good place to do that? The answer is yes.”http://www.washingtontimes.com/familytimes/20050917-104942-2368r.htm

Who were these "guests from Capitol Hill? The Washington Times article fails to say.The placement of Nationals Stadium obviously essentially extends the building line of St. Vincent De Paul Church southward, blocking off the eastern half of the South Capitol Mall.Was perhaps Theodore Lerner’s placement of his 20 M Street project a favor to McCarrick to buttress St. Vincent de Paul Church’s existing placement, perhaps so that McCarrick could use his influence to have Lerner “selected” as the owner of the Nationals? Or was this just a coincidence?Who knows?And what about the acquiescence of the U.S. government?Why no accounting to the public of the identities of the government officials that sold out our South Capitol Mall?

Posted by Douglas A. Willinger at 2:01 PM

.....................

The IAO caught the attention of many observers because of its use of the Masonic eye-in-pyramid symbol in its original logo. That logo featured the eye of Providence from the Great Seal of the United States gazing at the Earth, and the Latin motto scientia est potentia, meaning "knowledge is power". In addition, "Iao" is another name for a gnostic supreme deity and sun-god, the Demiurge which is purportedly referred to in Masonic ritual. The pyramid has 13 steps, the same of that on the the US 1 dollar bill Note that the thing is to the "back and to the left" of the globe, as well as on the U.S. $1 bill, as a divine irony symbolizing the secretive Jesuit-Masonic ruling elite.

Rat-lines in Trieste

• The geometry of the Novo Ordo Seclorum - 1
• The geometry of the Novo Ordo Seclorum - 2
• “Give me a fourteen, and I can enslave the earth”
• Rat-lines - 1 or: The Triangle of Virgo - conclusion and new start
• Rat-lines - 2 or: Rome, the Mother of All the Cornerstones

Rat-lines in Washington, D.C.

• Benjamin Franklin's Mysterious SunFire
• Frederic Delano's 'Family':U.S. National Capital Planning Commission,the "Committee of 100", and Covington & Burling
• Appearances of Power
• The Betrayal

-------------------------------------------------(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

"....and imposes it through his International Maritime Admiralty Law" (video):

There's no mystery in the fact that only two 'serious' monarchies survived in the world and are the Spanish one and the British one. The first one survived for obvious Roman Catholic reasons: they are related to an Italian papal bloodline, the Farnese, a family who commissioned with four century in advance the building of the Pentagon in their American plantations (see the Pentagonal headquarter in Rome to murder Protestants in the First 30 Years War ). And they are simply the papal guardians of the Latin Kingdom ('Israel'...). King Juan Carlos is the King of Jerusalem.But it is with the second that we have a more interesting side of the NWO: the Windsor or Hannover or Welf survived because their bloodline permits the legitimacy of the contract of 3rd October 1213 (just some years to the 800th anniversary...) with which the Vatican purchased the Britisch kingdom and "future pertinences": America, India, etc.So it is not a mysterious fact the presence of a Roman Catholic agent of Rome at the head of the "biggest democracy in the world": Sonia Gandhi. And it is not a mystery also the fled of the Templars in England, from where they spread the Vatican Canonical law under the disguise of the "British empire".But it is not a mystery also the fact that today Rome has again a Roman Catholic as governor of the American plantation: president Obama, who converted at the Ted's funeral (he will officialize the conversion at the end of the mandate).And that the future president of Vatican European Union is too a Roman Catholic: Tony Blair.And for the fact that with the end of the first conflict of the Second 30 Years War (1914 – 1945) the Protestant churches have been exterminated, being their existence related to the German bloodlines who where putted at their top by the same Martin Luther.And there's no mystery why they had to exterminate the Blood of David from Eurasia and to exterminate the First Lutheran state ever existed in the world – Protestant Prussia – before to start to build their second military Rome with Washington D.C.And also it is not a mystery the fact that you see Jews everywhere in the financial world. Renegade Jews who sold their Judaism in exchange of the money of Rome – especially in the Vatican American plantations: being them declared by Rome “Assassins of Christ”, every document they undersign is: v-o-i-d. So they can realize the most dirty financial operation of Rome and if they'll fulfill the desire of Rome (to act as Jewish front men), they can held for themselves some bits of the Vatican wealth. This is the reason for which Amschel Mayer Rotschield was a Roman Catholic knight of Malta.And it is not a mystery the fact that the most criminal religious entity ever existed on earth – that Roman Catholic church responsible of centuries of blood – today dares to presents itself as the “champion of Human Rights/Democracy in the world”: Democracy is the dictatorship of the majority on the minority, and the vote in the world is only a signature of the people which recognizes the legitimacy of their government: being the government the tool to impose the slavery of the International Admiralty/Commercial Code/Canonical Vatican law in all the countries (via International Settlement bank of Basel), whatever government legitimized by whatever majority (persuading people to vote under the threat of the tradional dictatorship) is only a legitimacy to the Vatican Admiralty law/Central Banking system world dictatorship.So the British crown is the administrator of the American plantations. And the Vatican is the proprietary of the American plantations. Since 3rd October 1213. It is absolutely not a mystery why the American Congress building is similar to the Mother house in saint Peter square and why the British flag is the exact replica of the image of the same saint Peter square:This video is also quoted in the thread of The Unhived Mind forum:http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?showtopic=25055

"British Monarchy is a corporation / US is a, Corporation of Rome, not a country [Vd]"

...........

The one below is a thread I opened in The Unhived Mind forum two years before, just in the anniversary, on the 3rd October 2007:BRITISH EMPIRE & AMERICA, A VATIKAN PROPERTY SINCE OCTOBER 3RD, 1213.http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=33413Were Washington and Papist Bishop John Carroll Good Buddies?http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1264

AMSCHEL MAYER ROTHSCHILD: Knight of Malta

http://endrtimes.blogspot.com/2009/10/amschel-mayer-rothschild-knight-of.html

"....the Holy Apostolic See (the Vatican) and the Roman Pontiff hold the primacy over the whole world" :http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2010/01/holy-apostolic-see-vatican-and-roman.html

------------------------------------------------(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

"....the Holy Apostolic See (the Vatican) and the Roman Pontiff hold the primacy over the whole world" :

.................

SpirituallySmart.Com is back! Read the latest message of Thomas Richards:

http://spirituallysmart.blogspot.com/2010/01/bush-said-he-saw-god-when-he-looked-in.html

Friday, January 15, 2010

Bush said he saw "God" when he looked in the eyes of the Pope...

He also said "God" told him to attack Iraq...after reading this below read the article "A Catholic Wind in the White House" which appeared in the Washington Post."The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in Heaven and earth." -Pope Pius V, quoted in Barclay, Chapter XXVII, p. 218, "Cities Petrus Bertanous"."...the Pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief of kings, having plenitude of power." -Lucius Ferraris, in "Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica, Juridica, Moralis, Theologica, Ascetica, Polemica, Rubristica, Historica", Volume V, article on "Papa, Article II", titled "Concerning the extent of Papal dignity, authority, or dominion and infallibility", #1, 5, 13-15, 18, published in Petit-Montrouge (Paris) by J. P. Migne, 1858 edition.These words are written in the Roman Canon Law 1685: "To believe that our Lord God the Pope has not the power to decree as he is decreed, is to be deemed heretical."Writers on the Canon Law say, "The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in heaven and earth."-Barclay Cap. XXVII, p. 218. Cities Petrus Bertrandus, Pius V. - Cardinal Cusa supports his statement.Pope Nicholas I declared: "the appellation of God had been confirmed by Constantine on the Pope, who, being God, cannot be judged by man." - Labb IX Dist.: 96 Can. 7, Satis evidentur, Decret Gratian Primer Para."The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man .... he is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief of kings, having plenitude of power." - Lucius Ferraris, «Prompta Bibliotheca», 1763, Volume VI, 'Papa II', pp.25-29"The supreme teacher in the Church is the Roman Pontiff. Union of minds, therefore, requires... complete submission and obedience of will to the Church and to the Roman Pontiff, as to God Himself." - Leo VIII, «On the Chief Duties of Christians as Citizens», Encyclical letter, 1890"Hence the Pope is crowned with a triple crown, as king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions (infernorum)." - Lucius Ferraris, «Prompta Bibliotheca», 1763, Volume VI, 'Papa II', p.26)"We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty" - Pope Leo XIII Encyclical Letter of June 20, 1894"The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, he is Jesus Christ himself, hidden under the veil of flesh." - Catholic National July 1895"The pope is the supreme judge of the law of the land... He is the vicegerent (replacement) of Christ, who is not only a Priest forever, but also King of kings and Lord of lords." - La Civilia Cattolica, March 18, 1871, quoted in Leonard Woosely Bacaon, An inside view of the Vatican Council (American Tract Society ed.), p.229"The pope is the supreme judge of the law of the land . . . He is the vicegerent of Christ, and is not only a priest forever, but also King of kings and Lord of lords" - La Civilta Cattolica, March 18, 1871."All the faithful must believe that the Holy Apostolic See and the Roman Pontiff [the Pope] possesses the primacy over the whole world, and the Roman Pontiff is the successor of blessed Peter, Prince of the Apostles, and is true vicar of Christ, and heed of the whole church, and father and teacher of all Christians; and that full power was given to him in blessed Peter to rule, feed, and govern the universal Church by Jesus Christ our Lord." -First Dogmatic Constitution on the Church of Christ, "Eternal Pastor," - published in the fourth session of the Vatican Council, 1870, chap. 3, in Philip Schaff, Creeds of Christendom. vol. 2, p. 262.

"We define that the Holy Apostolic See (the Vatican) and the Roman Pontiff hold the primacy over the whole world."- A Decree of the Council of Trent, quoted in Philippe Labbe and Gabriel Cossart, "The Most Holy Councils," col. 1167.

(The bold and larger characters of last paragraph are mine - avles)------------------------------------------------(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

Afghan deja vu

So it seems we are arrived to a crucial point. Will the war between America and Iran explode? Franckly I am not much interested in the real material war. I think that the material war around ideological and political subjects is the continuation of a theological war. What interest to me is to know the true background of the apparent spectacle offered by the Novo Ordo Seclorum to the masses.Hence finally the pope of Teheran could have his “Mit brennender Sorge” encyclical. It was the recent troubles in the elections of the new president of Iran and the consequent clashes who were and are used by Rome and her Islamic priests of Teheran to individuate and destroy the “enemy within”. But all that was not sufficient. Today it is required also the physical elimination of those inner enemies. Those enemies are the ‘heretics’ for of the Catholic Islam of Iran. But the priests of Teheran couldn’t do the religious assassination of the inner ‘heretics’ without a world-wide consequence and exposition. At the opposite, they needed of a world-wide emotional screen to hide the axles of the butcher. Rome helped them, and a Roman Catholic president putted on the chair of the governor for the civil affairs of the American plantations (namely: President of United States etc.), is the best present for the pope of Teheran. Many think that two infallible popes cannot live on the same planet. Error. They can, especially if the weak one (the Iranian one) could be useful for the enlargement of he world empire of the strongest one (pope of Rome).All that is clear and true like the sun which arises every morning to enlighten the painful valleys of this sad planet. The theological monsters of Teheran couldn’t allow such a terrorist attempt as the recent one in Sistan-Baluchistan, without to be sure that the world propaganda would have not covered in a favourable way their false flag attack. Or do you think that for real does exist an ‘American’ or ‘Jewish’ hand in those sixty dead?Of course for the occult Roman Catholic world wide propaganda only the American and the Jews are able to create “false flag” attacks. Because they are the theological evil. The theological ‘good’, the Roman Catholicism and his ally the Islam, are “innocent, sincere and ingénue” and “never could engineer a false flag attack”. If now that terrorist attack would let the theological Padrinos of Iran to wipe definitively away all the ‘dissidents’ (read again: ‘heretics), it will be only for a quantum mechanical coincidence, of course! And not for an intentional purpose! The just-in-time previous electoral troubles, happened short before the attack, are “absolutely not linked with it”.And then of course it is a pure casualty the fact that in that attack, the S’hia and Sunnite blood are mixed. “Sh’ia and Sunnite – united and strong against the American Satan”?As always happens, the CIA and Mossad are ‘bad’ and ‘perfidous’, but their ‘perfidous’ actions always supply the enemy with the weapon to gain a total victory. It is not strange that just on the 13th October it was announced – in homage to the evil Templars – that Barack Obama decided to send other 13,000 American soldiers in Afghanistan. Between Sh’ia and Sunnite nations.But I don’t believe that the terrorist attack was a “CIA and Mossad” dirty job. I believe at the opposite that the hour X is near the angle and many "van der Lubbe" of Iran have to be beheaded on the public scaffold. Terrorist supporter Roman Catholic Barack Obama is sending in the Afghan trap the best American troops. His brother Islamic Ahmadinejad is building the premises for the final extermination of the cursed American army in the Afghan trap. The Zionists-of-the-pope at power in Israel are giving the necessary aggressive alibi to Ahmadinejad to further rage on the dissidents (now described as "collaborationists of Zionist enemy"). The CIA is headed by a Jesuit trained boss, Panetta, who is working for the Jesuit agenda of the Inquisitiorial war against the White Protestant American, and is a man with sufficient power to deliver directly to the Iranian intelligence with all the proofs involving “American agents” in the terrorist attack. Among the victims of the last terrorist attack in the region of Sistan-Baluchistan there’s the Pasdaran general Nourali Shoushtari, a very important man and a strong supporter of Ahamdinejad. Hence his murder is a clear message: “the civil opposition to Ahmadinejad is in moral, spiritual compliance with the assassins of Nourali Shoushtari”. A man that assured the full military support to the same religious leaders of the country contested by the rioters. Hence they are now not only simple ‘heretics’ but also ‘assassins’ and it is an oblige to wipe ‘em all away. The terrorist group “Jundullah” which claimed responsability for the massacre is related to the Sunnite. Here's another blackmail to the Sunnite who now have to demonstrate their loyality towards the Teheran’s authorities especially supporting the repression of the opposition, if they don’t want to finish at the bar in the Religious court as "supporters of the terrorists".And so on. A deja vu?Hence it is not strange that in the seat of the Harlot, the Apennine peninsula, some strange facts occurred in these days. Now it is clear one of the reason for which P2ist Roman Catholic knight of Constantine order saluted president Barack Obama in Pittsburgh (recent meeting on the global warming) saying “Obama speaks with the heart!”. The sentence is not only linked with the “ ’God’ is cleansing Italy” operation. Around the day when the Italian prime minister saluted in that way his Jesuit-Masonic brother Barack Obama, six Italian soldiers went killed by an attack in Afghanistan. Again the “strategy of Carlo Giuliani”? Yes, it smells like they did in the Genoa 2001 G8 summit police brutalities. The Police brutalities involved nearly only the civil State Police and not the military Carabineers. Except for one case. Probably, in order to push away the stench of the convenience for the Carabineers’ army to see the competitor civil State Police destroyed in the dignity by the police brutalities, the Carabineers killed a violent rioter during the rally, Carlo Giuliani. No one would then suspect the Carabineers for having dealt a probable secret accord with or having gained benefit from the most violent rioters who caused the bloody answer of civil State Police. And no one will dare to imagine that the destruction of the State Police reputation simply is a plan engineered to leave the Carabineers as only true both civil and military police force in the nation.So a pair of week ago, meanwhile the tensions were increasing in that area, six Italians went murdered by a strange attack. No one would then suspect a sort of involvement in the probable future bloody defeat of the American troops. To strengthen this impression, a week after the attack to the Italian soldiers in Afghanistan, a mysterious Libyan terrorist tried to kill himself together with the sentinel at the entrance of a military infantry base in Milan, Italy. Were those six Italian killed in Afghanistan and that mysterious Libyan kamikaze the Carlo Giuliani of today? In order to support this version of the facts some days ago the Times online published some revelations on how the Italians paid money in order to gain safety for their troops in Afghanistan. The case exploded after someone exposed his doubts about the circumstances of the dead of ten French paratroops in the same Afghan area delivered by the Italians in the French hands. It resulted that the Italian intelligence paid the Taliban leaders (defence minister Ignazio La Russa defended himself saying that only the tribal chief were paid….) in order to avoid attacks. Translation and revelation of the true religious message: the Italian (read: Vatican) intelligence paid the Islamic terrorist in order to gain a certificate of “Religious friendship with the Islamic cause”. The Romish Catho-Islamic pact is a matter of reality and it was blessed with the 17th February 2008 Kosovo independence day, where Roman Catholic Croatia and Islamic Albania won definitively on the ‘heretic’, the Orthodox Christian Serbia.But which is the concrete role of the Italian troops in Afghanistan? To understand it you must go 70 years before, in the “Russian campaign of Mussolini”.Afghanistan probably has to become a sort of Stalingrad of today and I am saying nothin of exceptional, just go to the Douglas Willinger's CCR blog on the right side of this page to see the source for such an inspiration. Seventy years ago the Protestant Prussia based Wehrmacht was massacred in Russia by the Red army of the Roman Catholic Stalin in front. And in the rear you had the gun barrels of the Jesuit SS-pigs of Roman Catholic Hitler. But often it went forgotten also a third presence, the stone tied at the neck consisting in the purposely not efficient Italian army of Mussolini. Today, all that has to happen again? Is this the reason of the presence today of the Roman Catholic Italian soldiers in Afghanistan together the American and British ones? So which role did have Italy in the Second World War? The Wehrmacht was slowed down by the ballast of the inefficient Italian army. Purposely. Hitler was constrained (obeying to his master Ledochowsky) to send troops in Greece to rescue the Italian army which was defeated by an army of courageous peasants. Wasting fresh energies and dragging away from the Russian front divisions. The total defeat of the ARMIR, the expedition army of Mussolini, also today is kept in the darkness. This was an army then transformed from a military ally of the Hitler’s plans to a killing stone tied to the neck of Wehrmacht, allowing the Roman Catholic Stalin (in secret accord to Roman Catholic Hitler) to decimate the same Protestant based German army. Could be the true role today of Italy in Afghanistan, Irak, Kosovo, etc., similar to the one of 70 years ago? Of course in the complete un-awareness of the same Italian soldiers and of a good part of their officials probably destined to be ‘sacrificed’ in the name of the next Vatican and Jesuit Stalingrad in Afghanistan?Looking to the incoming events with from this historical/religious perspective, all those last events involving the Islamic world, the terrorist attacks in Iran against Iranian civil and military authorities, in Afghanistan against Italian troops, in the same Milan against military targets, the encrypted Masonic messages of Silvio, the revelations of the Times online about the bribery of the Vatic-Italian intelligence paid to the Talibans, are like pieces of a puzzles which suddenly are perfectly fitting one to the other, to form the image of an incoming nightmare. The hour “X” is coming accompanied with the “P” of the word “pope”.I forgot just only two details. First, the day before the terrorist attack in the Iranian region of Sistan-Baluchistan, the Italian minister for agriculture Vincenzo d’Urso expressed publicly the opinion of many members of his party, the Alleanza Nazionale of Gianfranco Fini, in other words the necessity to introduce a facultative hour in the school program where the Islamic religion is teached to everyone would ask for it. Such a proposal are not “just for a case” launched in the air and are telling us that the end of the Western and Christian world is near.And second. If I remember well, after the embassy of S. Domingo, the large foreign embassy in the city of Vatican is the Iranian emabssy. Two popes - One Steel pact.It will take not a great effort: first you'll make explode the scandal "governmental involvement in the 9/11" and you'll obtain a divided nation. The division will kept paralyzed the army forces meanwhile the external conventional enemy will attack America. Both inner fronts of the new bloody civil war around the "9/11" truth will get in alliance with one or more of the external forces attacking America, following the convenience in order to destroy the other civil front, the rest is only a deja vu. For now only a scenario, but all the material elements of it are just present.

Deja vu?

------------------------------------------------(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

How does Vatican defend itself from Pedophilia charges?

ACCUSING YOU.

I am constrained to write another message just two days after the previous one, I hate this because the previous message, "Is 'God' cleansing Italy?" is very important. Anyway... lets write another desperate message in the bottle!......

Yes, I gave a look to that last thread in The Unhived Mind forum. I know that. I was warned by the new Vatican criminal world strategy to exit from the heavy world exposition (being the organization "Roman Catholic church" the biggest or among the biggest pedophile world nets) just two months ago, after an event I consider a pure stealth raid in my home which leaved a clear sexual symbolic warning message (**). All that occured after I exposed the national public third tv news channel (***) as an occult defender of the Vatican pedophile net in America.What they did leave in my home, that night? Did they leave in my home something in order to frame me later? Did they took from me biological substances in order to spread them on the usual "object of the crime"? They could have spared all those efforts, a month later I did some test with urine and blood in the near hospital centre, there they could take all the genetic code of my physic person in order to frame the undersigned, as they usually do since years. An example of what they can do has been exposed by me in that old historical "Low intensity coup of Carabineers etc." thread in the old "13" The Unhived Mind forum and are the posts related to the "Massacre of small town Erba". Near Erba it was founded the international spread Radio Maria, and look, the greatest finger pointed to whom I consider framed innocents , is the one of a official of Carabineers. Carabineers have as patron saint the "virgin Mary", to them consecrated by pope Pacelli (the one accustomed with a butler named Adolph Hitler), in 1947..............(*)So...... c'mon, you bastard pigs! Yeah, frame me, you, filthy assassin dribble exited from the ass***e of your Master, the Antichrist! I wait you, bloody worms! I know you want to wipe me away, you are only waiting the right moment and the right place. Now you are doing your final coupe of 2010 and you are ready. But I too am ready!Well, below you can see how they continue with the Roman Polanskyzation of Europe.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=a6TT1VLcZaNA"By Gregory Viscusi......Sarkozy Adviser Says Mitterrand Needn’t Quit Over Sex Tourism ........................ Oct. 8 (Bloomberg) -- French Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand shouldn’t have to resign over admissions that he engaged in sexual tourism in Southeast Asia, one of President Nicolas Sarkozy’s advisers said. .............................The issue was brought into the public eye by the anti- immigration National Front and taken up by the opposition Socialist Party. Mitterrand has been one of the main French defenders of filmmaker Roman Polanski, who is fighting extradition to the U.S. from Switzerland over having had sex with a 13-year-old girl....Last Updated: October 8, 2009 04:32 EDT ....".

So another one of their puppets is exposed for: pedophilia, for having supported ideologically it and for having supported the Roman Polansky innocence!!!Yeah, I had under my eyes also first hands witnesses, in this case not about pedophilia, but about homosexual tours & travels of some priests of city of Trieste!You can see well that they are the first one to spread pedophilia (and homosexuality) for two essential reasons:1) Pedophilia weaken the natural family based on the couple of different sexual sign, both consenting partner and based on real love. Vatican is an absolute power, but if you really love a partner and the children 'product' of that love, you put the Vatican and its ill church in a second plane. Hence the natural family and the love of two different sexually person, is the greatest enemy of the evil church of Rome. Stop.2) And finally, as you can see, pedophilia is a very strong means to blackmail people. Hence they have all the interest to spread it in every corner of this sad planet.Pedophilia and homosexuality are the vital elements to allow the evil church of Rome to survive sucking the blood of the society on this planet.So is not a novelty for me that "pointing the finger" the assassin does to discharge the guilty on innocents. And of course "Jews" and "Protestants" are the target N°1.From The Unhived Mind forum, latest thread of Craig Oxley:

Vatican’s New Defense on Child Molestation Charges, Finger-pointing

http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?s=0d233981ee9bba5eb4fb32e2cf160a32&showtopic=21183

Posted: Oct 8 2009, 10:55 AMBy craig-oxley

B

Here you go folks, yet more proof the Church of Rome still detests it's enemies to the core as in their Council of Trent they will not abolish. -CraigVatican’s New Defense on Child Molestation Charges: Finger-pointingBy Rebecca DubePublished October 07, 2009, issue of October 16, 2009.http://forward.com/articles/116201/The Jews and Protestants are worse.That appears to be the Vatican’s newest defense of its ongoing child sex-abuse scandal.Responding to criticism, Catholic Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, the Vatican’s representative to United Nations organizations in Geneva, read a statement on September 21 to the U.N. Human Rights Council, noting that reports of sex abuse were common in the Jewish community and that most of the American churches being hit by sex abuse allegations were Protestant.“As the Catholic Church has been busy cleaning its own house,” Tomasi wrote, “it would be good if other institutions and authorities, where the major part of abuses are reported, could do the same and inform the media about it.”Tomasi’s statement came in response to an accusation from a representative of the International Humanist and Ethical Union, Keith Porteous Wood, that the Catholic Church had covered up child abuse and was in breach of several articles under the Convention on the Rights of the Child.Jewish leaders were dismayed by the Archbishop’s finger-pointing.“I was shocked by the statement. I don’t believe in comparing abuse. That’s a dangerous path to travel,” said Rabbi Joseph Potasnik, head of the New York Board of Rabbis, the largest interdenominational rabbinic organization in the world. “They have a problem they need to address; we have a problem we need to examine. Every faith community needs to be accountable to its members.”In his statement delivered to the Human Rights Council, Tomasi estimated that over the past 50 years, as many as one in 20 Catholic clergy has been involved in sexual abuse. The Archbishop cited articles in the Christian Science Monitor and the Journal of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College that estimated abuse rates in the Protestant and Jewish communities matching or exceeding that among Catholics. (No reputable studies exist that quantify rates of child sexual abuse by religious leaders in the Jewish community.)“One person is too many, so a numbers discussion is not the way to approach it,” Potasnik said.Over the past decade, thousands of Catholic priests around the world have been accused of molesting children and the Church has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to settle sex-abuse lawsuits. The litigation exposed a far-reaching cover-up of child sexual abuse by the Church hierarchy, which included transferring pedophile priests to new parishes and intimidating victims and their families into silence. In the past few years, revelations of sexual abuse within Orthodox Jewish communities have begun to generate similar allegations and lawsuits.Tomasi’s statement also drew a bizarre distinction between pedophilia and “ephebophilia,” which he defined as a “homosexual attraction to adolescent males.”“Of all priests involved in the abuses, 80% to 90% belong to this sexual orientation minority, which is sexually engaged with adolescent boys between the age of 11 and 17 years old,” Tomasi stated.The organization that originally criticized the Church to the U.N. council, the International Humanist and Ethical Union, characterized Tomasi’s reply as “comprehensively missing the point.”“No doubt there are abusers in all walks of life, but our point was not the abuse itself but the cover-up in which some of the highest officials of the Church were implicated,” the IHEU said.Attorney Irwin Zalkin said he was unsurprised by the Vatican representative’s remarks. Zalkin has represented hundreds of victims of sexual abuse in lawsuits against the Catholic Church.“They just don’t get it. There’s still a complete failure to take responsibility,” Zalkin said. For centuries, he said, Catholic leaders have tried to sweep under the carpet the problem of child sexual abuse. “The sin of scandal far outweighs, in their institutional response, any concern for the safety of children. That has been the problem.”Zalkin said he has also represented sexual abuse victims in lawsuits against Jewish organizations, Protestant churches, the Boy Scouts and other secular groups, but that the overwhelming majority of people who contact him have claims against the Catholic Church.“Does [child sexual abuse] exist elsewhere? Of course it does,” Zalkin said. “But not really in the numbers we’re seeing in the Catholic Church.”Zalkin noted that he is receiving a growing number of inquiries from alleged victims of sex abuse in New York’s Orthodox communities.“There’s a similar circle-the-wagons attitude, a similar response to that of the Catholic Church,” Zalkin said. “It’s unfortunate.”In the best-case scenario, Potasnik said, other religions will learn from the Catholic Church’s example and become more responsive to and vigilant about child sexual abuse. Like many other Jewish organizations, the New York Board of Rabbis has crafted guidelines for working with children intended to prevent abuse.Because of the Catholic scandal, Potasnik said, “The clergy are much more sensitive. There’s a greater sense that we cannot afford to close our eyes.”Contact Rebecca Dube at dube@forward.com

----------------RatzyAdolphshallBurninHell-----------------

See also the article of the Guardian on line:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/apr/24/children.childprotection

• News
• World news

Pope 'obstructed' sex abuse inquiry

Confidential letter reveals Ratzinger ordered bishops to keep allegations secret

• Buzz up!
• Digg it

• Jamie Doward, religious affairs correspondent
• The Observer, Sunday 24 April 2005 09.58 BST
• Article history

Pope Benedict XVI faced claims last night he had 'obstructed justice' after it emerged he issued an order ensuring the church's investigations into child sex abuse claims be carried out in secret.

The order was made in a confidential letter, obtained by The Observer, which was sent to every Catholic bishop in May 2001.

It asserted the church's right to hold its inquiries behind closed doors and keep the evidence confidential for up to 10 years after the victims reached adulthood. The letter was signed by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who was elected as John Paul II's successor last week.

Lawyers acting for abuse victims claim it was designed to prevent the allegations from becoming public knowledge or being investigated by the police. They accuse Ratzinger of committing a 'clear obstruction of justice'.

The letter, 'concerning very grave sins', was sent from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican office that once presided over the Inquisition and was overseen by Ratzinger.

It spells out to bishops the church's position on a number of matters ranging from celebrating the eucharist with a non-Catholic to sexual abuse by a cleric 'with a minor below the age of 18 years'. Ratzinger's letter states that the church can claim jurisdiction in cases where abuse has been 'perpetrated with a minor by a cleric'.

The letter states that the church's jurisdiction 'begins to run from the day when the minor has completed the 18th year of age' and lasts for 10 years.

It orders that 'preliminary investigations' into any claims of abuse should be sent to Ratzinger's office, which has the option of referring them back to private tribunals in which the 'functions of judge, promoter of justice, notary and legal representative can validly be performed for these cases only by priests'.

'Cases of this kind are subject to the pontifical secret,' Ratzinger's letter concludes. Breaching the pontifical secret at any time while the 10-year jurisdiction order is operating carries penalties, including the threat of excommunication.

The letter is referred to in documents relating to a lawsuit filed earlier this year against a church in Texas and Ratzinger on behalf of two alleged abuse victims. By sending the letter, lawyers acting for the alleged victims claim the cardinal conspired to obstruct justice.

Daniel Shea, the lawyer for the two alleged victims who discovered the letter, said: 'It speaks for itself. You have to ask: why do you not start the clock ticking until the kid turns 18? It's an obstruction of justice.'

Father John Beal, professor of canon law at the Catholic University of America, gave an oral deposition under oath on 8 April last year in which he admitted to Shea that the letter extended the church's jurisdiction and control over sexual assault crimes.

The Ratzinger letter was co-signed by Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone who gave an interview two years ago in which he hinted at the church's opposition to allowing outside agencies to investigate abuse claims.

'In my opinion, the demand that a bishop be obligated to contact the police in order to denounce a priest who has admitted the offence of paedophilia is unfounded,' Bertone said.

(what a bunch of damned criminals!!! - note of avles)

Shea criticised the order that abuse allegations should be investigated only in secret tribunals. 'They are imposing procedures and secrecy on these cases. If law enforcement agencies find out about the case, they can deal with it. But you can't investigate a case if you never find out about it. If you can manage to keep it secret for 18 years plus 10 the priest will get away with it,' Shea added.

A spokeswoman in the Vatican press office declined to comment when told about the contents of the letter. 'This is not a public document, so we would not talk about it,' she said.

----------------RatzyAdolphshallBurninHell-----------------

And also:

http://dissidentvoice.org/Apr05/Whitney0426.htmRatzinger�s Plan to Hide the Pedophiles by Mike Whitney www.dissidentvoice.orgApril 26, 2005

The U.K. Observer has produced evidence that the new Pope Benedict XVI was directly involved in obstructing justice in the investigation of pedophile priests. The article, �Confidential letter reveals Ratzinger ordered Bishops to keep allegations secret,� details how Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger �issued an order ensuring the church�s investigations into sex abuse claims be carried out in secret.� The order was sent to American bishops in May 2001 and �asserted the church�s right to hold its inquiries behind closed doors and keep the evidence confidential for up to 10 years after the victims reached adulthood.� (18 years old)

What right would that be? The right to protect the Catholic Church from the lawsuits of psychologically damaged victims? Or the right to ignore the laws of the host nation in which the pedophile priests were serving? The letter was signed by Ratzinger and came directly from his office at the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, which serves as the papal thought police, bringing errant priests and progressives into line with Catholic doctrine.

Ratzinger�s edict states unequivocally that the �church can claim jurisdiction in cases where abuse has been perpetrated with a minor by a cleric.�

Really? Now, what jurisdiction might that be? Certainly nothing in the Federal penal code allows a cardinal or anyone else to willfully eschew the known laws of the land and bury the facts related to criminal investigations.

Ratzinger�s letter is such an egregious violation of the law it simply boggles the mind. But, that�s just the half of it. Ratzinger claimed that the church had the right to bury these cases for 10 years after the minor has �completed the 18th year of age.�

This goes well beyond simple loyalty to one�s church. These are the calculations of someone whose moral judgment is so abysmal he shouldn�t be trusted in anything.

Is that too harsh? How else would you describe someone who cooks up a plan to obstruct justice and deliberately perpetuate the suffering of innocent children? Ratzinger�s action can only be described as vile and inexcusable.

It would be interesting to see how Ratzinger would explain his behavior in terms of his frequently espoused theories on �moral relativism�. In the real world, there are few moral absolutes, but child abuse certainly rises to that standard.

Caveat Ratzinger

To show how serious Ratzinger took the sex abuse scandal, he issued the warning in his letter, �Breaching the pontifical secret at any time while the 10 year jurisdiction order is operating carries penalties, including the threat of excommunication.�

This is terrible. It shows the current Pope acting like a Mafia chieftain, binding his subjects to silence (�Omerta�) and threatening to throw them out of the church if they fail. It also shows that his plan to obstruct justice was neither reflexive nor simply a �moral lapse�; it was a well-thought out conspiracy designed to intimidate church leaders and force them to shut up and hide the evidence.

At the same time the Observer was releasing the details of Ratzinger�s letter, the new Pope was carrying out his first official act: lambasting the Spanish government for allowing marriage for homosexuals.

The Vatican described the new bill, which will become law in a few months, as �profoundly iniquitous� and said that Catholic officials should be prepared to �lose their jobs rather than cooperate with the law.� (BBC)

Unbelievable. How can the marriage of two consenting adults committing themselves to a life together be �iniquitous�, while the concealing of known sex predators who have ruined the lives of countless children be acceptable?

Ratzinger has established a new benchmark for ecclesiastical duplicity. His disparaging remarks about women (she should �follow the roles inscribed by her biology�) and gays (they are inherently disposed �to intrinsic moral evil� and their rights can be �legitimately limited�) are already part of the public record. This new chapter only adds to his (already) dismal legacy.

Ratzinger is the worst thing that could have happened to the Catholic Church. The world needs a counterbalance to the militaristic chauvinism of Bush. Another Pope John XXIII would have been nice: a warm, conciliatory pontiff, extending the hand of friendship and goodwill the other religions. Regrettably, Ratzinger is the polar opposite of the affable architect of Ecumenical Council II. He�s already established himself as the pitchman for �traditional values�, discipline and papal authority. It�s only a matter of time before the hair shirts and chastity belts are retrieved from the subterranean Vatican vault.

Conspiracy Theory: the Bush and Ratzinger Collaboration

Sidney Blumenthal�s recent article �Holy Warriors� draws some interesting connections between Bush and the new pope. As Blumenthal notes, �Bush pleaded with the Vatican to pressure the bishops to step up their activism against abortion and gay marriage in the states during the campaign season. About a week later Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger sent a letter to the US bishops, pronouncing that those Catholics who were pro-choice on abortion were committing a grave sin and must be denied Communion. He pointedly mentioned �the case of a Catholic politician consistently campaigning and voting for permissive abortion and euthanasia laws.��

To understand how extraordinary Ratzinger�s letter was, we need to ask ourselves �when was the last time a pope actively campaigned on the behalf of a presidential candidate?�

How about never!

Is there any doubt that Ratzinger�s remarks were intended to assist Bush? His criticism torpedoed the Kerry campaign and handed a larger percentage of the Catholic vote to Bush. That margin of difference may have been critical in determining the outcome of the election.

So, why would Ratzinger throw his weight behind Bush and exhibit his disloyalty to �one of his own�? (Kerry is a Catholic) Was it because of his unshakeable commitment to principle and moral righteousness? (Certainly, his attempts to subvert justice disprove that theory.) Or did it have something to do with the American sex abuse scandal?

Call it a hunch, but I think that Ratzinger�s political maneuverings prior to the presidential election were a quid pro quo for favors promised by the Bush administration to overlook legal issues pending in the US. Ratzinger knew he had the papal election in the bag, because, as Al Jazeera noted, �Pope John Paul appointed all but 2 of the men who elected the new pope.� The fix was in. He knew he had the votes, but he also knew that he had to avoid being implicated in (covering up) the sex scandal or lose his shot at becoming pope.

One thing is certain, if justice had been served in Boston, Cardinal Law would be in leg-irons right now picking up soda cans and candy wrappers on the Mass Pike and Herr Ratzinger would be staving off extradition to the US on charges of obstruction of justice.

Instead, he�s the new head honcho of world Catholicism, blowing kisses to the adoring crowds while, at the same time, condemning the ravages of liberalism. This is an arrangement that works for Bush, too. With a reactionary ideologue in the swivel chair at the Vatican, Bush is assured that his Catholic base will stay put and the carping from Rome about Iraq will be at a minimum.

Pope Benedict XVI elicited his dark vision of humanity during the papal ceremonies on Sunday. He said, �We are living in alienation, in the salt waters of suffering and death, in a sea of darkness without light. The net of the Gospels pulls us out of the water of death and brings us into the splendor of God�s light, into true life.�

How often have we heard this same ominous Hobbesian vision articulated by autocrats attempting to ratify their own personal agenda. Ratzinger�s worldview may be his own bleak projection of reality, but his imposing position in the church hierarchy suggests that we may all feel its repercussions.

Mike Whitney lives in Washington state, and can be reached at: fergiewhitney@msn.com.

----------------RatzyAdolphshallBurninHell-----------------

(***) See:

Tau, G, Pyramid with Eye, the happy Vatican-Masonic informative brigade

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2009/10/tau-g-pyramid-with-eye-happy-vatican.html

(**) See:

I PAID 54 EURO TO INSTALL A ROMISH INTELLIGENCE VIRUS

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2009/09/i-paid-54-euro-to-install-romish.html

(*) See:

http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=27169&st=45Feb 18 2008, 01:41 PM by avles"..........CARABINEERS INVOLVED IN THE SATURNALIA MASSACRE OF ERBA (Dec. 2006) DURING THE VISIT OF OLMERT IN VATIKAN AND DURING HOLOCAUST DENIAL CONFERENCE IN TEHERAN.In Italy a couple is under trial for having slaughtered an entire family. The fact happened just before the visit of Olmert in Italy in December 2006. If you remember well, during the same visit an Holocaust-warning was launched to the Jews who saw all their principal buildings as school, synagogues etc. in Rome, without protection. It never happened – If I remember well – since the OLP terrorist attacks in the airport of Rome in the eighties. I remember the article of Barry Chamish:........I.e.: "....2008-02-18 11:49 ERBA: OLINDO, “I WAS SUBMITTED TO THE BRAINWASH” COMO- Olindo Romano, indicted for the Massacre of Erba, during his spontaneous declarations said he was submitted to the “brainwash” for having being induced to confess his responsibilities in the murder. Romano told that he has been essentially induced to confess in a conversation with the Carabineers, the 10th January 2007, before the arrival of the magistrates in the Bassone prison of Como. At the hearing was present also the wife of Romano, Rosa Bazzi.It was like “they had done on me the brainwash and I thought to all that they told us about the conveniences and opportunities for us”, affirmed Olindo Romano. Then he explained: “I asked to speak with my wife, but they told me that it wasn’t possible and that only the magistrate could have authorized it; but first I had to confess and then the magistrate would arrive”Olindo told that he fell “into desperation”. The hearing is going further with the deposition of the lieutenant Luciano Gallorini, commander of the station (of Carabineers) of Erba, who was the first to address the inquiries on the couple of neighbours (= Olindo and Rosa) living near the victims. On 11th December 2006 in Diaz street civic number 25, four people were murdered: Raffaella Castagna, his son Youssef, just little more than two years old, the mother of the woman, Paola Galli and a neighbour woman, Valeria Cherubini. Seriously wounded – but then survived - remained the husband of Cherubini, Mario Frigerio, principal witness for the indictment, whose deposition is expected to be held on the next 26th February.....etc...."............"

-------------------------------------------------(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)